PUSHPA RANI AND ANOTHER v. JOGINDER KAUR AND OTHERS
INCOMP/1212/2026 · 2026-05-27
Vikas Bahl
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20894 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20894 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (149) INCOMP-1212-2026 Case Type: CR Date of decision: - 27.05.2026 Pushpa Rani and another ....Petitioners Versus Joginder Kaur and others .....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present:- None. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)
1. The present case was filed in the registry and the registry had raised certain objections which were not removed by the learned counsel.
2. As per Rule 9, Chapter 1, Part-A, Volume V. Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules and Orders, a case wherein objections have been raised by the Registry, the same is to be taken back by the counsel/party concerned, to be re-filed within a period of 40 days.
3. Since the case file was not taken back for doing the needful by the learned counsel concerned, despite a specific note having been given in the cause list requesting the counsel to collect the case file for removal of objections, the Registry has listed this incomplete matter before this Court.
4. In view of the fact that no steps were taken by the counsel concerned for re-filing of the case after removal of objections, no order is called for on the judicial side and the instant incomplete petition stands
disposed of. Registry is directed to weed out the incomplete paper-book as per the Rules.
( VIKAS BAHL ) May 27, 2026
JUDGE naresh.k Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No NARESH KUMAR 2026.05.27 18:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement