Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA REVIEW PETITION FAMILY COURT NO. 44 OF 2026
BETWEEN SRI MOHSIN AHMED, S/O ABDUL SUBHAN, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/A NO. 2, DINNUR MAIN ROAD, OPP. NAVADYA SCHOOL, R. T. NAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 032.
...PETITIONER/S
(By SRI/SMT. : RAFEEQ AHMED SHAIK, ADVOCATE)
AND
1 .
SMT. SALMA SULTHANA, W/O MOHSIN AHMED, D/O LATE NOORULLA SHARIFF, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/O NO. 509, 1ST MAIN ROAD, BHUVANESHWARI NAGAR, R. T. NAGAR POST, BENGALURU – 560 032.
…2 Digitally signed by SUKANYA R Location: High Court of Karnataka
RPFC NO. 44 of 2026 2 2 .
ALEENA AHMED, D/O MOHSIN AHMED, AGED ABOUT 3 YEARS, R/O NO. 509, 1ST MAIN ROAD, BHUVANESHWARI NAGAR, R. T. NAGAR POST, BENGALURU – 560 032.
(SINCE MINOR THUS REPRESENTED BY HER MOTHER – 1ST PETITIONER) ...RESPONDENT/S
RPFC FILED UNDER SEC. 19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 30.09.2025 PASSED ON I. A. NO. 2 IN Crl. Misc. NO. 424/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BENGALURU PARTLY ALLOWING THE I. A. NO. 2 FILED UNDER SEC. 125 OF Cr.P.C., FOR MAINTENANCE.
This RPFC coming on for Orders, this day the Court made the following Order:
ORAL ORDER
No representation on petitioner's side on call.
As per office endorsement, objections are not yet complied. Time for two weeks is granted to comply the office objections. …3
RPFC NO. 44 of 2026 3 In case office objections are not complied within the time granted, appeal be dismissed without further reference to the Bench.
Sd/- (DR. CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA)
JUDGE
NOTE : Vide Court Order dated 17.02.2026, office objections are not complied with. Hence, the petition is hereby dismissed.
COPY
Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By : SR R By : PH C By : GS
Ty Dt : 18.05.2026 C.Dt : 18.05.2026