Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20892 (KAR)

SMT H M SANGEETHA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/20445/2022 · 2026-06-11

M I Arun

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28253 WP No. 20445 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO. 20445 OF 2022 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. H.M.SANGEETHA W/O VEERAIAH AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R/AT DOOR NO.818 SPS NAGAR 2ND PHASE DAVANAGERE-577 006 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. GOPALA, ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY CO-OPERATIVE DEPARTMENT ROOM NO.610, 6TH FLOOR 3RD GATE, M.S. BUILDING BENGALURU-560 001 2. REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES NO.1, ALI ASKAR ROAD BENGALURU-560 001 3. DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ROOM NO.52/53, B BLOCK FIRST FLOOR, KARUR Digitally signed by V MANJUSHA BAI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28253 WP No. 20445 of 2022 INDUSTRIAL AREA, P.B.ROAD DAVANAGERE-577 006 4. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES AND ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF MONEY LENDERS AND PAWN BROKERS DAVANAGERE SUB DIVISION OPPOSITE TO ANJANEYA TEMPLE VIDYANAGAR, DAVANAGERE-577 004 5. SRI. G.M.ANANTHAJYOTHI S/O PARAMASHIVAIAH AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS ADVOCATE R/AT DOOR NO.32, 15TH CROSS KONDAJJI ROAD, ASHOKANAGAR DAVANAGERE-577 004 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. YOGESH D.NAIK, AGA FOR R1 TO R4; SRI. SUNEEL S.NARAYAN, ADVOCATE FOR R5) THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ENDORSEMENT NO.SaNi31/DVG/Levadevi/CR- 13/2022-23 DATED 30.4.2022 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.4 AT ANNEXURE-A WHO REFUSED TO INITIATE ACTION UNDER KARNATAKA MONEY LENDING ACT, 1961 AGAINST R5 AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28253 WP No. 20445 of 2022 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN ORAL ORDER None appears for the petitioner. Even on the last occasion also, none appeared for the petitioner. The writ petition is of the year 2022. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE PGG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20