5 wp 2540-2012.odt 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2540 OF 2012 Pankor Wd/o Narayan Suradkar VERSUS The Member, Mah. Revenue Tribunal, Nagpur And Ors - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- ------------ - Shri P.S. Wathore, Advocate for petitioner Shri A.M. Ghogre, AGP for respondents/State Shri C.J. Dhumane, Advocate for respondent No.4 CORAM : PRAVIN S. PATIL, J. DATE : 16.10.2026 1. In the present matter, in the order dated 24.06.2025, it is recorded that respondent No.4 has given proposal for settlement and parties are likely to explore the said possibility of settlement and hence matter was adjourned. Thereafter the matter was listed on 13.10.2026. On that day, none appeared on behalf of the parties in the matter and, therefore, this matter is kept today. 2. Today, Shri P.S. Wathore, learned Counsel for petitioner states that he is trying to get instructions from the petitioner, but no one is responding to him and, therefore, he has issued the communication by registered post dated 16.10.2026. Accordingly, he requested to discharge him from the present petition. 5 wp 2540-2012.odt 2 3. In view of this statement, Shri P.S. Wathore, learned Counsel for petitioner is discharged from the present petition. 4. Shri C.J. Dhumane, learned Counsel appearing for respondent No.4 also made a statement that respondent No.4 has already taken away the case papers from him and, therefore, he is not having instructions in the matter. Hence, Shri C.J. Dhumane, learned Counsel for respondent No.4 is also discharged in the present matter. 5. From all these facts, it is clear that parties are not interested to prosecute the present petition. Therefore, for want of prosecution, the petition stands dismissed. 6. If the parties are interested and file an application for restoration within a period of 30 days, the same shall be considered positively by this Court. (PRAVIN S. PATIL J.) R.S. Sahare Signed by: Mrs. Ranjana Sahare Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 16/10/2026 18:03:07