Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20889 (AP)

SRI LAKSHMI TRACTORS v. SRI B RAJASEKHAR

CC/1398/2025 · 2026-02-05

V Sujatha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010250602025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1398/2025 Between: 1. SRI LAKSHMI TRACTORS, A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, TIMMIREDDY NARESH REDDY, S/O OBULREDDY, AGED 41 YEARS, O/O. MARKET YARD GOOTY, SY.NO.81/3, NEERUGANT STREET, GOOTY ROAD, ANANTAPURAM, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI B RAJASEKHAR, S/O. NOT KNOWN, WORKING AS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI S DILLI RAO, S/O. NOT KNOWN, WORKING AS COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, OLD MIRCHI YARD, NALLAPADU, CHUTTUGUNTA, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SMT UMA MAHESWARAMMA, W/O. NOT KNOWN, WORKING AS JOINT DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, ANANTAPURAM, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT. 4. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, S/O. NOT KNOWN, WORKING AS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 2. BH RAMA KRISHNA NAIK The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1398/2025 O R D E R: This Contempt Case is filed for willful violation of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.4642 of 2024 on 22.04.2024, wherein this Court passed the following order: “…In view of the above, this Court feels it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition, directing the respondents to release admitted bill amount of Rs.39,00,000/-payable to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of four (04) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.” 2. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the order dated 22.04.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.No.4642 of 2024 has been complied-with by the respondents. Therefore, requested this Court to close the contempt case. 3. Recording the above submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. _______________________ SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA KS Dated 06.02.2026. 4 49 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1398/2025 DATED 06.02.2026 KS