Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20884 (CHH)

CHUNNI LAL CHANDRAKAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/2915/2022 · 2026-05-08

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR NATIONAL LOK ADALAT Dated - 09 th May, 2026 CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT CAMPUS-BILASPUR WPS No. 2915 of 2022 1 - Chunni Lal Chandrakar S/o Shri Doman Lal Chandrakar Aged About 43 Years Working As A Constable, O/o The Superintendent Of Police Mahasamund, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Home/ Police, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Police Station And Post Rakhi, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Inspector General of Police (I.G.P.)/ Chairman Constable To Head Constable, Departmental Promotion Committee, Raipur, Range, Shankar Nagar Road, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Superintendent of Police (S.P.) Office of The Superintendent of Police, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) _________________________________________________________ For Petitioner: Petitioner Chunni Lal Chandrakar through virtual mode from the office of Superintendent of Police, Mahasamund. For State/Respondents : Mr. Shobhit Mishra, Deputy Govt. Advocate. ORDER (PASSED ON 09.05.2026) 1. Petitioner Chunni Lal Chandrakar appeared through virtual mode and he has been identified by Mr. Praveen Chouhan, Inspector of Police, Mahasamund (C.G.) in virtual mode. Digitally signed by MOHAMMED AADIL KHAN Date: 2026.05.12 17:13:26 +0530 2 2. Parties have filed a compromise petition. 3. On verification, the petitioner submits that relief claimed in the petition has already been granted to him and he has been promoted on the post of Head Constable and now he does not want to press the present writ petition further. 4. Since the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed and he does not want to press this petition further, the present writ petition is disposed. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Vaibhav Shukla) Judge -Lok Adalat Member- Lok Adalat High Court of Chhattisgarh High Court of Chhattisgarh Bilaspur Bilaspur Aadil