Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:21822
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR NATIONAL LOK ADALAT Judge - Lok Adalat : Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru Member - Lok Adalat : Shri Malay Shrivastava, Advocate WPS No. 13104 of 2025 Annapurna Dewangan W/o Manoj Dewangan Aged About 43 Years Post- Lecturer (L.B) Physics At Govt- Higher Secondary School Chichor Umariya, Block- Pusaur, Dist- Raigarh, (C.G.) R/o Makan No.Lig K 7, Boirdadar Housing, Board Colony, Raigarh, Ward No.27, Raigarh, Dist- Raigarh (C.G.)
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, Department Of School Education Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya, Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Secretary Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Director Directorate Of Public Instruction Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagr Naya Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2026.05.09 15:18:38 +0530
2 4 - Commissioner Cum Director Directorate Of Panchayat, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) 5 - District Education Officer Raigarh District- Raigarh (C.G.) 6 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Raigarh, District- Raigarh (C.G.)
... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Petitioner appears through Video Conferencing (self attested copy of Aadhaar Card attached with the compromise petition) For Respondent(s) : Shri Gopal Yadav, Dy. Govt Advocate along with Shri K.V. Rao, District Education Officer Raigarh (C.G.) AWARD (Passed on 09.05.2026)
1. By the instant petition, the petitioner has challenged the arbitrary action of the respondent authorities in not granting the benefit of Kramonnati Vetanman in terms of circular/order dated 10.03.2017 referring to Instruction dated 04.08.2010, though the petitioner is entitled to receive the said benefit on completion of 10 years of service. 2. However, the petitioner, appearing through video conferencing, submits that owing to personal reasons, she does not want to
3 pursue the present petition any further and seeks permission to withdraw the same. 3. In view of the submission made by the parties, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. 4. The Court also recorded that the contesting parties had amicably settled the dispute and, finding the terms of compromise to be just, proper, and legal, accepted the settlement arrived at between them. 5. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of as withdrawn. 6. A copy of the docket (compromise arrived at between the parties) be made part of this award.
Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Malay Shrivastava) Judge - Lok Adalat Member - Lok Adalat High Court of Chhattisgarh High Court of Chhattisgarh shoaib