Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2088 (KAR)

SMT NAGAMANI v. SRI SHARADA MAHILA CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD

WP/3352/2026 · 2026-02-24

Ashok S Kinagi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11497 WP No. 3352 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 3352 OF 2026 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: 1. SMT NAGAMANI W/O VENKATACHALAIAH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/O GOWDRA STREET WARD NO. 4 CHICKPET TUMAKURU -572101 2. SRI VENKATACHALAIAH S/O PUTTAGANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/O GOWDRA STREET WARD NO. 4 CHICKPET TUMAKURU -572101 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VIRUPAKSHAIAH P.H, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI SHARADA MAHILA CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD SRI JAYACHAMARAJENDRA ROAD TUMAKURU -572101 Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11497 WP No. 3352 of 2026 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER/ AUTHORIZED OFFICER SMT NETHRAVATHI K S D/O SRIKANTHAIAH K C AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS …RESPONDENT THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 14.01.2026 IN CRIMINAL MISC. NO. 344/2025 PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, TUMAKURU VIDE ANNEXURE-C AND VACATE NOTICE DATED 21.01.2026 USED BY THE RESPONDENT BANK VIDE ANNEXURE-D HOLDING THE SAME ARE ILLEGAL AND WITHOUT JURISDICTION; ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER WRIT OR ORDER OF DIRECTION IN THE SIMILAR NATURE DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT BANK TO CONSIDER THE CASE OF THE PETITIONERS FOR ONE TIME SETTLEMENT OF THE OUTSTANDING LOAN LIABILITY, ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11497 WP No. 3352 of 2026 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with a liberty to approach the Debts Recovery Tribunal (‘DRT’ for short). 2. Memo is taken on record. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. A liberty is reserved for the petitioners to approach the DRT within 15 days from today, and the respondent is directed not to take any coercive action for a period of 15 days from today. 5. In view of dismissal of the petition, pending IA(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE PA | List No.: 1 Sl No.: 45