[2026:RJ-JP:2839] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 20447/2025 Pawan Kumar Prajapat S/o Shri Madan Lal, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Ward No. 9 Indergarh, District Bundi, (Rajasthan) At Present Teacher Grade Iii, Level I Government Upper Primary School, In- dergarh, District Bundi (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Additional Chief Secretary, School Education, Administra- tive Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Director Elementary Education, Bikaner 3. District Education Officer, Headquarter, Bundi. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sudhir Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gopal Krishan Sharma, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 20/01/2026 1 Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: “it is, therefore, most humbly prayed that aforemen- tioned reply may kindly be accepted and taken on record and accordingly the Writ Petition filed by the Petitioner may kindly be dismissed with costs.” 2 Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon judgment dated 14.01.2022 in D.B. Spl. Appeal Writ No.683/2021 titled as State of Rajasthan and Ors. Vs. Mool Shanker submits that the controversy and the is- sue raised herein is already settled by a Division Bench of [2026:RJ-JP:2839] (2 of 2) [CW-20447/2025] this Hon’ble Court. He further submitted that instant writ pe- tition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3 Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for parties and also material placed on record, the writ petition may be disposed in light of State of Rajasthan and Ors. Vs. Mool Shanker (supra) passed by the Division Bench of this Court. 4 Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respon- dents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case of State of Rajasthan and Ors. Vs. Mool Shanker (supra), but in case of deviation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E- mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5 Needless to say that if ratio is applicable upon facts of the case as claimed by the petitioner, then same benefits be ex- tended. 6 With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /359