Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20868 (ORI)

SACHIN MEHER v. STATE OF ODISHA

ABLAPL/6497/2026 · 2026-06-17

V Narasingh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No. 6497 of 2026 Sachin Meher …. Petitioner Mr. J. Panda, Advocate -versus- 1. State of Odisha 2. State of Maharastra …. Opposite Parties Mr. C. R. Swain, AGA CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH Order No. ORDER 17.06.2026 01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. This is an application for transit anticipatory bail in connection with Nagpur City Cyber P.S. Case No. 124 dated 24.12.2025 under Sections 66(C) and 66(D) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, read with Sections 318(2), 318(4), 319(2), 204, 336(2), 336(3), 338, 340(1), 340(2) and 61(2)(b) of BNS, 2023 pending before Cyber Police Station, Nagpur City, Maharashtra. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel that the Petitioner’s presence was directed in terms of the notice issued on 10.04.2026 vide Annexure-2. And, it is also stated that since the date fixed has elapsed in the meanwhile, there is apprehension of arrest. p. 2 4. Considering the nature of allegations, this Court directs that the Petitioner shall appear before the concerned Police Station on or before 20.07.2026 or it is open to seek any other remedy in accordance with law in the interregnum. 5. Till 20.07.2026, no coercive action shall be taken against the Petitioner in the aforementioned case. 6. In the event the Petitioner fails to appear on 20.07.2026, subject to any order passed by the Court of competent jurisdiction, it shall be open for the Investigating Agency to proceed in accordance with law. 7. Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of. (V. NARASINGH) Vacation Judge Jina