Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20867 (RAJ)

SABIR S/O ISRAIL v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/16873/2025 · 2026-01-07

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:359] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16873/2025 1. Sabir S/o Israil, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Village Burakam, Police Station Nuh, District Nuh, Hariyana. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Ajmer). 2. Jamu S/o Sallu, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Village Dhakpuri, Police Station Tijara, District Alwar (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Ajmer). 3. Juber S/o Nijer Mohammad, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Near Masjid, Rajpur, Police Station Punhana, District Nuh, Hariyana. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Ajmer). 4. Mustfa S/o Naiem, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Village Firojpur, Police Station Firojpur, District Nuh, Hariyana. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Ajmer). ----Petitioners Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Surendra Singh Sunda For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agrawal, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 07/01/2026 1. Petitioners have filed this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S., arising out of F.I.R. No.0221/2025 registered with the Police Station Kishangarh, District Ajmer for offence under Sections 3, 5 & 8 of Rajasthan Camel (Prohibition of Slaughter and Regulation of Temporary Migration or Export) Act, 2015. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made by the learned [2026:RJ-JP:359] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-16873/2025] counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor. 4. The allegation against the petitioners is that they were transporting about twenty six (26) camels in a truck. 5. On perusal of the contents of the First Information Report, there seems to be no allegation of slaughter of the camels. 6. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners and so also the allegation against the petitioners and the fact that the accused petitioners are in custody since 02.12.2025, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail. 7. This bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter be transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /214