DURGA DEVI W/O PARASRAM MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/16866/2025 · 2026-01-27
Ganesh Ram Meena
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20866 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20866 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:3617] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16866/2025 Durga Devi W/o Parasram Meena, R/o Village Singhpura, P.s. Rahuwas, District Dausa. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hemant Kankoriya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, Addl.G.A. cum P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order 27/01/2026
1. Petitioner has filed this anticipatory bail application under Section 482 B.N.S.S. arising out of F.I.R. No.112/2025 registered with the Police Station, Rahuwas, District Dausa for offence under Section 326(g) of B.N.S., 2023.
2. The learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case merely because she is the wife of co-accused Parasram and the complainant party has implicated both the husband and wife in the matter. He further submits that the accused-petitioner is a woman and she is ready to cooperate in the investigation in future, hence, she may be extended the benefit of anticipatory bail.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the anticipatory bail application.
[2026:RJ-JP:3617] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-16866/2025]
4. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the case diary.
5. The allegation against the accused-petitioner is that she was with her husband, who is said to have tried to make attack on the complainant and later on set the complainant’s house on fire.
6. Taking into consideration the allegation against the present petitioner and more particularly the fact that the petitioner is a woman and her husband Parasram has already been arrested and enlarged on bail, this Court deems just and proper to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
7. The Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed. The S.H.O./I.O./Arresting Authority, Police Station Rahuwas, District Dausa in F.I.R. No. 112/2025 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner she shall be released on bail, provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to his satisfaction on the following conditions:- (I). that the petitioner shall make herself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii). that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the
facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer, and
[2026:RJ-JP:3617] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-16866/2025] (iii). that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /262