RUSTAM ANSARI @ MD RUSTAM ANSARY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./6780/2026 · 2026-07-21
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20866 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20866 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:21485 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.6780 of 2026
------ Rustam Ansari @ Md. Rustam Ansari, aged about 43 years, Son of Md. Nijamudin Ansari, Resident of Village-Kishanpur, Post Office- Margomunda, Police Station-Margomunda, District-Deoghar, Jharkhand.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Pramod Kr. Jha, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Azeemuddin, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 21-07-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Margomunda P.S. Case No.33 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under sections 25(1-B)(a), 26, 35 of the Arms Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in illegally selling fire arms and from the co-accused, 01 country made pistol and 04 live cartridges was recovered and she disclosed that with the help of the petitioner, she collects the illegal fire arms for selling. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is then submitted that no incriminating article has been recovered from the petitioner. It is also submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 22.06.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no.14 of the bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on
furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Madhupur, in connection with Margomunda P.S. Case No.33 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 21/07/2026 Abhiraj/