Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20865 (CAL)

MOHAN PRADHAN v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

WPA/15697/2003 · 2026-05-19

Ravi Krishan Kapur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

100 19.05.2026 Ct. No.07 J.Das IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE WPA 15697 of 2003 IA NO: CAN/1/2003(Old No:CAN/9531/2003) MOHAN PRADHAN VS THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL 1. None appears on behalf of the parties nor is any adjournment prayed for even in the second call. 2. This matter was appearing in the Warning List and the parties had sufficient notice that the same would be taken up for hearing. There is also no adjournment prayed for on their behalf. A Report filed by the Department indicates that despite efforts, the records of this proceeding are not traceable. It also appears from the Report that the proceeding is not traceable even in the CIS as well as the available Rule Register and Movement Registers under the custody of the Mandamus Section. 3. In view of the above, WPA 15697 of 2003 along with connection application stand dismissed for default. 4. Interim orders, if any, stand vacated. 5. The department is directed to take necessary steps forthwith. (Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.) 2