- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28206 WP No. 19738 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 08TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.19738 OF 2024 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. I.V. CHANDRASHEKAR S/O LATE VENKATACHALAPATHY SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT NO.107, SEENAPPA LAYOUT, WARD NO.3, SANTHEBEEDI, ANEKAL TOWN, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT-562106. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, KANDAYA BHAVAN, K.G ROAD, BENGALURU -560009. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU SOUTH SUB-DIVISION, KANDAYA BHAVAN, K.G ROAD, BENGALURU -560009. 3. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, ANEKAL TALUK, ANEKAL-562106. 4. SRI. RANGAPPA, S/O LATE SIDDAPPA, Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28206 WP No. 19738 of 2024 AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT HAMPALAGHATTA VILLAGE, KASABA HOLBI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT 562106. 5. SRI. MUNIKRISHNAPPA S/O LATE CHINNAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/AT HAMPALAGHATTA VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT - 562 106. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE N., HCGP FOR R4; SRI. N. DEVARAJU, ADVOCATE FOR R5 ) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 16.12.2023 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 IN RP NO. 203/2022 (ANNEXURE-A); QUASH/SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 07.12.2021 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 IN RA (A)449/2021 (ANNEXURE-B) BY ALLOWING THIS WRIT PETITION AND CONSEQUENTLY RESTORE THE REVENUE RECORDS IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER IN RESPECT OF THE LAND IN SY NO.76/1A (OLD SY NO. 76/1) MEASURING 1 ACRE 20 GUNTAS ,(OUT OF 4 ACRES 10 GUNTAS) SITUATED AT HAMPALAGHATTA VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK AS PER MR NO.4/2020-21. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28206 WP No. 19738 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. In this Writ Petition, petitioner is assailing the order dated 16.12.2023 (Annexure-A), passed by respondent No.1 in R.P. No.203/2022, inter alia, challenging the order dated 07.12.2021 passed by respondent No.2 in No. R.A(A):449/2021 (Annexure-B), and consequently seeking restoration of the revenue records in the name of the petitioner as per M.R.No.4/2020-21. 2. Sri. Vijaya Kumar K., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, invited the attention of the Court to the registered Sale Deed dated 05.07.2006, wherein the petitioner had purchased the schedule property from one Sri. M. Gurappa and pursuant to the same, the jurisdictional Special Tahsildar, Anekal Taluk has entered the name of the petitioner in M.R.No.4/2020-21 and further submitted that the same was erroneously interfered with by the respondent - authority by the impugned order at Annexures - 'A and B', which requires to be set aside by this Court. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28206 WP No. 19738 of 2024 3. It is also argued by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner by referring to the proceedings before this Court in RSA No.713/2014 that rights of the parties would be decided in the said proceedings and therefore, sought for interference of this Court. Learned counsel also submitted that the petitioner, in terms of the order on I.A.1/2014 dated 21.08.2025 in RSA No.713/2014 passed by this Court, undertakes not to create any third party right in the schedule property in question. 4. Sri. N. Devaraju, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.5 submitted that respondent No.5 had purchased the schedule property much prior to the petitioner herein and therefore, sought for dismissal of the Writ Petition. 5. Sri. H.C. Shivaramu, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.4, sought to justify the change in entry in the revenue records as this Court is yet to consider the rights of the parties in terms of the Judgment and Decree that may be passed in RSA No.713/2014. 6. Learned Additional Government Advocate sought to justify the impugned order and sought for dismissal of the Writ Petition. - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28206 WP No. 19738 of 2024 7. In the light of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, it is not in dispute that entry in M.R.No.4/2020-21 is entered by the Tahsildar based on the registered Sale Deed dated 05.07.2006. 8. In that view of the matter, as mutation has been made pursuant to the execution of the registered Sale Deed and rights of the parties is yet to be adjudicated in RSA No.713/2014, I am of the view that, both the authorities have committed an error in interfering with the mutation made in favour of the petitioner in M.R.No.4/2020-21, pursuant to the execution of the registered Sale Deed. 9. In that view of the matter, awaiting rights of the parties to be decided in terms of the Judgment and Decree that may be passed by this Court in RSA No.713/2014, entry in M.R.No.4/2020-21 shall stand restored in the name of the petitioner, which shall be subject to the final outcome in the Judgment and Decree in RSA No.713/2014. It is also made clear that, as per the submission made by the learned counsel, petitioner shall not create any third party right in the property - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28206 WP No. 19738 of 2024 in question, till the conclusion of proceedings in RSA No.713/2014. 10. With the above observation, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. 11. Pending I.A.2/2025 is disposed of as not surviving for consideration. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13