Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20862 (JHR)

MIT KUMAR @ MEET YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./3874/2026 · 2026-07-21

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:21513 --1-- A.B.A. No. 3874 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3874 of 2026 ---- Mit Kumar @ Meet Yadav, aged about 22 years, son of Late Manjit Yadav, resident of village – Sirka, Khirgaon, PO – Hazaribag, PS – Sadar (Bara Bazar O.P.), District – Hazaribag .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Shailendra Jit, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Nawin Kr. Singh, Advocate ---- 02/21.07.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Lohsinghna P.S. Case No.240 of 2022 for the alleged offences registered under Sections 364/34 of Indian Penal Code pending in the Court of learned A.C.J.M., Hazaribag. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case alleging that the petitioner and others have abducted the son of the informant on a white color Scorpio vehicle. He further submits that this is a case of counter blast of the earlier case filed by the father of the petitioner. On these grounds, he submits that the anticipatory bail may kindly be granted. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer 2026:JHHC:21513 --2-- A.B.A. No. 3874 of 2026 and submits that allegations are there of abduction and the petitioner has six criminal antecedents and in view of that anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected. 5. Considering that there is direct allegation against the petitioner and others of abduction of son of the informant and the petitioner has six criminal antecedents, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 21.07.2026 Sangam/