Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20861 (CHH)

SATISH KUMAR BARRI v. MAMTA CHOUDHARY

CONT/658/2026 · 2026-05-06

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:21290 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 658 of 2026 1. Satish Kumar Barri S/o Motilal Bari Aged About 34 Years R/o Ward No. 22, Shaheed Veer Narayan Singh Ward, Chandani Chowk, Ambikapur, District- Sarguja (C.G.) 2. Purnima Singh W/o Chand Prakash Singh Aged About 38 Years R/o Ward No. 32, Ramanuj Ward, Babupara Ambikapur, District- Sarguja (C.G.) 3. Smt. Sunaina Soni W/o Shri Pancham Soni Aged About 61 Years R/o Ward No. 21, Sikari Road, Ambikapur, District Sarguja (C.G.) 4. Shama Parvin/ Kalim (Confirm Form List) W/o Md. Kalim Ansari Aged About 40 Years R/o Ward No. 30, Mayapur, Ambikapur, District Sarguja (C.G.) 5. Naresh Ekka S/o Sundar Ram Ekka Aged About 33 Years R/o Ward No. 46, Sant Hila Guru, Laxmipur, Tendupara, Ambikapur, District- Sarguja (C.G.) 6. Nujhat Fatima @ Nitu W/o Majibul Rehman Aged About 38 Years R/o Mahamaya Ward, Jarhagarh, Ambikapur, District- Sarguja (C.G.) 7. Firdosh Hussain Khan W/o Md. Hassan Khan Aged About 44 Years R/o Ward No. 39, Momin Pura, Ambikapur, District- Sarguja (C.G.) 8. Geeta Shrivastava S/o Deepak Kumar Shrivastava Aged About 40 Years R/o H.No. 252, Guru Ghasi Das Ward, Mission Hospital Road, Ambikapur, District- Sarguja (C.G.) 9. Fauzia Naaz Idrish W/o Md. Babbar Aged About 27 Years R/o House No. 2 Ring Road, Nawagarh, Ambikapur, District- Sarguja (C.G.) 10. Vinod Ekka S/o Late Bhola Ram Aged About 54 Years Occupation- Parshad- Ward No. 10, R/o Indiranagar, Fundurdihari Nawapara, Ambikapur, District- Sarguja (C.G.) JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2026.05.08 10:46:42 +0530 2 11. Geeta Rajak W/o Sanjay Rajak Aged About 37 Years R/o Ward No. 03 Gandhinagar, Turra Pani, Ambikapur, District- Sarguja (C.G.) 12. Geeta Prajapati W/o Shanker Prajapati Aged About 50 Years R/o Ward No. 16, Saheed Chandrashekar Azad Ward, Navapara, Ambikapur, District- Sarguja (C.G.) 13. Dr. Ajay Kumar Tirkey S/o Late Isaac Tirkey Aged About 57 Years R/o H.No. 150, Mother Teressa Ward 8, Mahua Para, Ambikapur, District- Sarguja (C.G.) 14. Ruhi Gazala D/o Moh. Kamarujama Aged About 45 Years R/o Moinpura, Ambikapur, District- Sarguja (C.G.) 15. Meela Tirkey W/o Balkeshwar Tirkey Aged About 45 Years R/o Ward No. 47, Gangapur, Ambikapur, District Sarguja (C.G.) 16. Sandhya Rawani W/o Prakash Kumar Rawani Aged About 55 Years Braham Road, Braham Para, Ward No. 33, Ambikapur, District Sarguja (C.G.) 17. Shailendra Soni S/o Late Aditya Soni Aged About 55 Years R/o Dr. Rajendra Prasad Ward, Ward No. 42, Manipur, Ambikapur, District Sarguja (C.G.) 18. Anjela Kerketta W/o Augustin Kerketta Aged About 58 Years Parshad- Ward No. 11, R/o Ward No. 48 Vishnupur Ward Ambikapur, District- Sarguja C.G. 19. Sandhya Tamrakar W/o Dharmendra Kumar Tamrakar Aged About 38 Years Parshad- Ward No. 17, R/o Mission Chowk- Kedarpur Ambikapur, District- Sarguja C.G. 20. Shubhash Kumar Paikra S/o Laxman Ram Paikra Aged About 45 Years Parshad- Ward No. 48, R/o Kanya Parisar Road, Kanwarpara Vishnupur, Ambikapur, District- Sarguja, C.G. 21. Meraj Rangrej S/o Serajuddin Aged About 55 Years Parshad- Ward No. 35, R/o Ward No. 36, Gurudwara Ward Mayapur Ambikapur, District- Sarguja, C.G. 22. Dwitendra Kumar Mishra S/o Shri Jeevan Nath Aged About 60 Years Parshad- Ward No. 7, R/o House No. 195, Near Kisan Rice Mill, Vivekanand Nagar Namnakala, Ambikapur, District- Sarguja C.G. ... Petitioner(s) 3 versus 1. Mamta Choudhary Secretary, Urban Administration And Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) 2. D. N. Kashyap Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Ambikapur, District Sarguja (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Tripathi, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board 07/05/2026 Heard. 1. The present contempt petition arises out of the alleged non-compliance of the order dated 28.11.2025 passed in WPS No. 5991 of 2025. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that since the present contempt petition is defective one, he may be permitted to withdraw the same with liberty to file a fresh. 3. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the present contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) JUDGE Jyoti