Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20859 (RAJ)

JOGENDRA SINGH GURJAR S/O SHRI SHRI DHAN SINGH v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/20213/2025 · 2026-02-06

Anand Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:5613] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 20213/2025 Jogendra Singh Gurjar S/o Shri Shri Dhan Singh, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Village Nayagaon, Tehsil Hindaun City, District Karauli. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt.of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Rajasthan Employee Selection Board, Jaipur Through Chairman State Agriculture Management Institution Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur. 3. Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner (Raj.) 4. National Council For Teacher Education, Through Its Director, Hans Bhawan, Wing-Ii, Bahadur Sah Zafar Marg, New Delhi- 110002. 5. Regional Director, (Northern Region), National Council For Teachers Education, 4Th Floor, Jeevan Nidhi-II, Lic Building, Ambedkar Circle, Bhawani Singh Marg, Jaipur- 302005. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R. D. Meena, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bhavya Kala, Adv. on behalf of Mr. Devansh Sharma, Dy. GC for respondent Nos.1 and 3. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 06/02/2026 1. Mr. Bhavya Kala, Adv. for Mr. Devansh Sharma, Dy. GC appears and accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 3. 2. Learned counsel has submitted that controversy involved in this case is squarely covered by the judgment of Division Bench of this Court dated 27.11.2025 passed in D.B. [2026:RJ-JP:5613] (2 of 2) [CW-20213/2025] Special Appeal (Writ) No.152/2023 (Bimala Kumari Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors.) and on the basis of judgment of Division Bench, Co-ordinate Bench of this Court has also disposed of S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.20212/2025 (Vijay Shankar Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) vide order dated 19.12.2025. 3. This fact has also not been disputed by learned counsel for the respondents. 4. In view of above consensus between learned counsels for the parties, this writ petition is disposed of with the same directions as given in the case of Bimla Kumari Vs. The State of Rajasthan (Supra). 5. The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. 6. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J Jatin /20