Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20858 (RAJ)

LOKENDRA SINGH S/O SHRI SURESHCHAND v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/16783/2025 · 2026-01-07

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:351] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16783/2025 1. Lokendra Singh S/o Shri Sureshchand, Aged About 25 Years, Village Naharauli Deshawar Police Station Janoothar District Deeg Rajasthan. (Presently Confined In District Jail Dausa, Rajasthan). 2. Harkesh Alias Sumo S/o Shri Mordhwaj, Aged About 22 Years, Village Naharauli Deshawar, Police Station Janoohar District Deeg Rajasthan (Presently Confined In District Jail Dausa, Rajasthan) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deepak Chauhan with Mr. Harsh Joshi For Complainant(s) For State : : Mr. Vikram Singh Chauhan Mr. Sudesh Saini, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 07/01/2026 1. Petitioners have filed this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S., arising out of F.I.R. No.138/2025 registered with the Police Station Janoothar, District Deeg for offence under Sections 189(2), 103(1), 115(2), 126(2), 137(2), 62 & 351(2) of B.N.S., 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that as per the contents of First Information Report, the complainant has alleged two incidents. As regards the first part of the said incident, the complainant party have already lodged a report at Police [2026:RJ-JP:351] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-16783/2025] Station Janoothar and in the second part of the said incident, the involvement of the present petitioners have been shown, however, subsequent to lodging of the F.I.R. as regards the first part of the incident, in the second part of the incident it is revealed that the death of Puran Singh has occurred and there is no involvement of the present petitioners. He also submits that even as per the postmortem report, there is no external injury sustained by the deceased Puran Singh. In the postmortem report, the cause of death was reserved till the FSL and Histopathological reports were received. On receiving the FSL and Histopathological reports, it was found that the cause of death of deceased Puran Singh was heart attack due to shock. He also submits that the accused petitioners are in custody since 24.09.2025 and the Police after completion of investigation, has submitted charge-sheet in the matter. He also submits that trial of the case will take long time to conclude, therefore, the petitioners may be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application and submit that the accused-petitioners have played an active role in committing the alleged offence. 4. Considered the submissions made at bar and perused the challan papers. 5. As per the postmortem report and so also the Histopathological report, the cause of death of deceased Puran Singh is heart attack. As per the contents of the F.I.R., there seems no involvement of the present petitioners in the alleged [2026:RJ-JP:351] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-16783/2025] incident, wherein it has been alleged that the death of deceased Puran Singh occurred. 6. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case as well as the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail. 7. This bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter be transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /204