- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26230 WP No. 8942 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 8942 OF 2022 (S-RES) BETWEEN: SMT R B YASHASWINI W/O LATE NAGESH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, HINDI TEACHER SARVAJANIKA SAMYUKTHA PADAVIPURVA COLLEGE NAGARAVARA CHENNAPATNA TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT – 562 159 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SOMASHEKHARAIAH R P., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION (PRIMARY AND SECONDARY) M S BUILDING BENGALURU-560001 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY 2. THE COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION NRUAPTHINGA ROAD BENGALURU-560001 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26230 WP No. 8942 of 2022 SECONDARY EDUCATION RAMANAGARA DISTRICT RAMANAGARA -562159 4. BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER CHANNAPATNA TALUK CHANNAPATNA RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562159 5. THE SECRETARY VAKKALIGA SARVAJANIKA VIDYARTHI NILAYA CHANNAPATNA TOWN CHANNAPATNA TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562159 6. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER RAMANAGAR ZILLA PANCHAYATH RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562159 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G. RAMESH NAIK, AGA FOR R1 TO R4 (MA NOT FILED) SRI. M.P. SRIKANTH, ADVOCATE FOR R5 R6 SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO APPROVE THE APPOINTMENT OF THE PETITIONER FOR THE POST OF ASSISTANT HINDI TEACHER BY CONSIDERING THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DTD. 09.06.2006 UNDER ANNX-C WITH ALL CONSEQUENTIAL BENEFITS IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26230 WP No. 8942 of 2022 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to make a representation to the respondents. 2. The memo is placed on record. 3. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty. If such a representation is made by the petitioner, the respondents are directed to consider the representation and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. 4. Pending interlocutory application/s, if any, shall stand disposed of accordingly. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE SKS