Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20854 (AP)

Smt. T.S. Anitha v. Smt. Sandhya Rani, I.P. O.S.

CC/775/2015 · 2026-02-24

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010246102015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 775/2015 Between: 1. SMT. T.S. ANITHA,, D/O T.S. SUBHASH, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC :P.G. TEACHER, (BOTANY), (U/T), A.P. MODEL SCHOOL, BAIREDDYPALLY, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SMT SANDHYA RANI I P O S, COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, AND EX-OFFICIO PROJECT DIRECTOR, RMSA, GOVT. OF A.P. LAKIDIKAPOOL, HYDERABAD. 2. SRI CH RAMANA KUMAR, REGIONAL DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, KADAPA, Y.S.R KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to summon the respondents herein and punish them under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, for willfully and deliberately violating the orders of this Hon'ble Court passed in W.P. M.P. No.11832/2015 in W.P.No. 8987/2015, dated 1.4.2015, consisting of Hon'ble Sri., Justice Nooty Ramamohan Rao, and pass 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SANTHAPUR SATYANARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. K V RAGHU VEER The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 775/2015 ORDER:- The contempt case has been filed for disobeying the Order of this Court dated 01.04.2015 passed in W.P.M.P.No.11832 of 2015 in W.P.No.8987 of 2015. 2. There is no representation for the petitioner. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr. K.V.Raghu Veer, learned counsel for respondents, submits that in view of the subsequent events, the orders dated 01.04.2015 have been complied with and also the main writ petition was disposed of on 27.04.2023, and therefore, the cause in the contempt case does not survive. 3. Recording the submission of the learned Standing Counsel, the contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 25.02.2026 S D P 4 251 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 775/2015 25.02.2026 W S D P