Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20853 (RAJ)

RAJESH KUMAR SHARMA S/O JAGAT RAM SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/20278/2025 · 2026-02-13

Anand Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:7097] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 20278/2025 Rajesh Kumar Sharma S/o Jagat Ram Sharma, Aged About 51 Years, R/o H. No. 50, Pragati Nagar, Kotra, Ajmer, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. The Principal, Govt. Sr. Secondary School, Tiloniya, Block Kishangarh, District Ajmer. 4. Anurodh Gokte, Principal, Govt. Sr. Secondary School, Palkhadel, Udaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini with Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vishal Kumar with Ms. Pooja Sharma for Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 13/02/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the petitioner has challenged transfer order dated 22.09.2025, however, during the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner has joined at the transferred place. 2. Learned counsel submits that under these circumstances, the petitioner may be granted liberty to make a representation before the competent authority by relying upon the order dated 01.12.2025 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, at Principal Seat, Jodhpur in D.B. Special Appeal Writ [2026:RJ-JP:7097] (2 of 2) [CW-20278/2025] No.1723/2025 (Harvinder Singh Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors.). 3. Such limited prayer has not been opposed by learned counsel for the respondents. 4. In view of above, this writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to submit a representation before the competent authority, who shall take into consideration the contents of representation and shall pass a speaking and reasoned order. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. 6. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s), disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J DIVYA /178