[2026:RJ-JP:1727] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 8270/2025 1. Vikas Meena S/o Nandlal Meena, Aged About 28 Years, R/ o 4, Sushma Bihar, 12 Mile, Shri Ram Ki Nagal, Sitapura, Sanganer, Jaipur (Raj.). 2. Sitaram Meena S/o Kishan Lal Meena, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Bhura Salaga Ki Dhani, Shri Ram Ki Nangal, Jaipur, (Raj.). ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Non-Petitioner 2. Shri Abhishek S/o Shri Ramdhan, Aged About 19 Years, R/o 28, 29, Mahaveer Nagar B Tol Taxe, Malpura Gate, Sanganer, Jaipur City(East), Rajasthan. --Complainant-Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Buddhi Prakash Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP Mr. H.R. Kumawat, for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 15/01/2026 1. By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 528 of BNSS, the accused-petitioners have approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.259/2024 registered at Police Station Malpura Gate, District Jaipur City (East) for offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 452, 382, 354, 427 & 34 of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that cross-cases have been registered between the parties. Counsel submits that now, parties have settled their dispute amicably. It is submitted that due to compromise, further proceedings in the aforesaid FIR [2026:RJ-JP:1727] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-8270/2025] are fruitless. The written compromise has been annexed with this petition. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor submits that in cross-FIR No.544/2024 registered at Sanganer Sadar, District Jaipur City (South), verification report has been received which shows that parties have entered into compromise. 4. Learned counsel for the complainant does not dispute the factum of compromise. 5. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for perusal; considering the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr-reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. [AIR 1992 SC 604] and as such, the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties. 6. In view of the above, this criminal misc. petition is allowed and the FIR No.259/2024 registered at Police Station Malpura Gate, District Jaipur City (East), is quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow. 7. The stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /314