APHC010245502025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1203/2025 Between: 1. A.B.Rajendra Prasad, S/O Late A.V.Bayya Reddy, Aged 56 Years R/O Maneendram Village, No. 88, Muddhanapalli Post, Ramakuppam Mandal, Chittoor district. ...PETITIONER AND 1. K R Chinnikrishna, S/ O Late K.Ramachandraiah, Aged 64 Years r/ o Konganapalli Village and Post, Ramakuppam Mandal, Chittoor district. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to allow the above Civil Revision Petition by setting aside the Docket Order dated 1.5.2025 passed in I.A.No. 59 of 2025 in O.S.N0.18 of 2025 on the file of Court of Hon'ble VIII Additional District Judge, Chittoor, by directing the Court of Hon'ble VIII Additional District Judge, Chittoor to forthwith take up the IA No. 59 of 2025 in O S No. 18 of 2025 for hearing and grant interim injunction in favour of the petitioner in respect of suit schedule property, in the interests of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to grant interim injunction in favour of the petitioner, restraining the Respondent, in any way, from alienating the petition schedule properties, as mentioned below, in favour of third parties, pending disposal of C R P No.1203 of 2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N RANGA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. K SRINIVAS The court made the following order: The present civil revision petition is filed aggrieved by the docket order dated 01.05.2025 passed in I.A.No.59 of 2025 in O.S.No.18 of 2025 on the file of court of learned VIII Addl. District Judge, Chittoor. 2. Heard Sri N.Ranga Reddy, learned counsel for the revision petitioner and Sri K.Srinivas, learned counsel for the respondent. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, the petitioner has now restricted his relief and sought for a direction of speedy disposal of the I.A.No.59/2025 before the court below and accordingly prayed to pass appropriate orders in that regard. 4. Since the relief sought by the petitioner is innocuous being only for speedy disposal of the I.A.No.59/2025 filed under Order 39 rule 1 & 2 for grant of temporary injunction, this court is inclined to dispose of the present revision petition with the following direction: “The Trial court is directed to dispose of the application vide I.A.No.59/2025 as expeditiously as possible and the parties shall cooperate with the enquiry.” Accordingly, the civil revision petition is disposed of. No costs. Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI BRS