Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20835 (KAR)

SRI. MOHAMMAD v. SMT. SAROJINI PADVETNAYA

RSA/744/2023 · 2026-06-10

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28037 RSA No. 744 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 744 OF 2023 (POS) BETWEEN: SRI. MOHAMMAD S/O LATE KHADRI BEARY, SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS 1. SMT NEBISA, W/O LATE SRI MOHAMMAD, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 2. MR ABDUL BATISHA S/O LATE SRI MOHAMMAD, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS 3. SMT SUMAYA D/O LATE SRI MOHAMMAD, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS 4. MISS SUHAIRA D/O LATE SRI MOHAMMAD, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT UJIE, CHARMADI ROAD, UJIRE VILLAGE AND POST, BELTHANGADY TALUK, D K DISTRICT 574240. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI RAKSHITH KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. SAROJINI PADVETNAYA W/O LATE SHYAMA PADVETNAYA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS Digitally signed by PRAMILA G V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28037 RSA No. 744 of 2023 2. SRI MADHAVA PADVETNAYA, S/O LATE SHYAMA PADVETNAYA, AGED ABOUT 89 YEARS 3. SRI VISHNU PADVETNAYA S/O LATE SHYAMA PADVETNAYA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS 4. SMT SEETHALAKSHMI D/O LATE SHYAMA PADVETNAYA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS 5. SRI SRIPATHI PADVETNAYA S/O LATE SHYAMA PADVETNAYA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS 6. SRI RAJARAMA PADVETNAYA S/O LATE SHYAMA PADVETNAYA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 7. SRI SHREESHA PADVETNAYA S/O LATE SHYAMA PADVETNAYA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS 8. SRI RADHAKIRHSNA PADVETNAYA S/O LATE SHYAMA PADVETNAYA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 9. SMT VASANTHI W/O JAYARAMA PADVETNAYA,AGED ABOUT 67 YRS 10. SRI SUNIL U P S/O JAYARAMA PADVETNAYA,AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 11. SRI SANDEEP U P S/O JAYARAMA PADVETNAYA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,RESPONDENT NO.1 TO 11 ARE R/AT MAINDELU HOUSE, BELAL ROAD, UJIRE VILLAGE AND POST, BELTHANGADY TALUK, D K. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28037 RSA No. 744 of 2023 12. SRI KASIM, S/O LATE KHADRI BEARY, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,R/AT UJIRE CHARMADI ROAD,UJIRE VILLAGE AND POST, BELTHANGADY TALUK,D K. …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.03.2021 PASSED IN RA NO.12/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BELTHANGADY.D.K., DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.07.2019 PASSED IN OS NO.14/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BELTHANGADY. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellants submit that despite best efforts be could not get any instructions from the appellants to do the needful. 2. Placing his submission on record, appeal stand dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE brn List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31