Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20835 (AP)

M/s.Mandava Institution of Engineering and Technology Jaggayyapet v. State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/11136/2019 · 2026-01-06

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010248422019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 11136/2019 Between: 1. M/S.MANDAVA INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY JAGGAYYAPET,, KRISHNA DISTRICT. REP.BY ITS DIRECTOR MANDAVA KUSUMA KUMARI W/O. SRIDHAR, AGED 28 YEARS, ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIATE, VELAGAPDI AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT MANGALAGIRI GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT AT MACHILIPATNAM. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, JAGGAYYAPETA POLICE STATION, KRISHNA DISTRICT 5. MR NARENDRA, CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE JAGGAYYAPET POLICE STATION, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6. MR DHARMA RAJU, SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE JAGGAYYAPET POLICE STATION, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 7. MR RAJU, SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE , JAGGAIAHPET, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 8. KAVITHA SUNKARA, D/O. VEERABANDRARAO, AGED 28 YEARS, OCC- JUNIOR FACULTY, D.NO.6-917, C/O.VENKATAGIRI GUTTA, PUTTA BAZAR, JAGGAIAPET, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 9. AVVARI VENKATA DINESH, S/O.MALLIKARJUANRAO AGED 33 OCC- JUNIOR FACULTY R/O.D.NO.5-646, 2ND LANE, KOPPURAOPALEM MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No.4 to 7 from interfering with affairs of the college for recovery of salaries and disturbing college staff and students as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of 2 India and to consequently direct the respondents 2nd and 3rd respondents to initiate action against the respondents No. 5 to 7 for misusing their official power and further direct the respondent No.3 not to interfere with the civil and service affairs of the petitioner institution and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents N.2 and 3 to initiate enquiry against the respondents No. 4 to 7 for their misuse of power and unlawful interference with the college affairs between 17.7.2019 to 5.8.2019 pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V V SATISH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.11136 OF 2019 ORDER: Sri G. Saideep, learned counsel representing Sri V. V. Satish, learned counsel for the petitioner, would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 2. Sri R. Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, is in attendance. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 7th January, 2026 cbn 4 44 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No: 11136 OF 2019 7th January, 2026 cbn