- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27391 WP No. 16716 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 16716 OF 2026 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: JAYAMURTHY S/O LATE SAMPATHAPPA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/AT VISHWANATHAPURA VILLAGE KUNDANA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK BENGALURU-562 110. REPRESENTED BY G.P.A HOLDER SEETHESH. B.N S/O NARAYANA REDDY.B AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS R/AT ULIBELE VILLAGE, BURUDUGUNTE POST, CHILAKALANERPU HOBLI, CHIKKABALLAPURA - 563 125. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SANATH KUMAR SHETTY K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. TAHSILDAR DEVANAHALLI TALUK DEVANAHALLI BENGALURU - 560 110. 2. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DEVANAHALLI TALUK DEVANAHALLI BENGALURU - 560 110. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27391 WP No. 16716 of 2026 3. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT BENGALURU - 560 001. 4. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO REVENUE DEPARTMENT M.S.BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE.N., HCGP) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS COMMANDING THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION MADE BY THE PETITIONER TO RESPONDENT NO.1 ON 18.06.2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-F AND THEREAFTER, MAKE NECESSARY CHANGE OF ENTRIES IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER IN THE REVENUE RECORDS IN RESPECT OF 2 ACRES OF LAND IN SY.NO.135 SITUATED AT SOLURU VILLAGE, KUNDANA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK AND ALSO ISSUE KHATA IN RESPECT OF THE SAID LAND IN SO FOR AS THIS PETITIONER IS CONCERNED. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27391 WP No. 16716 of 2026 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER The learned HCGP accepts notice for respondents. 2. The grievance of the petitioner, in this petition, is to consider the representation produced at Annexure-F to the writ petition, which has not been done till date. 3. Having taken note of the averments made in the aforementioned representation, it is stated that the land in question has been granted in favour of the petitioner. However, khatha has not been made in favour of the petitioner. In that view of the matter, Respondent No.1 is directed to consider the representation made by the petitioner herein, after verifying the original records to ascertain whether the land has been granted in favour of the petitioner or not. Thereafter, Respondent No.1 is directed to take decision in the matter within four months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27391 WP No. 16716 of 2026 4. With this observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE DH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34