Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:785] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16766/2025 Priyanka W/o Krishan, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Mothuka Thesil Bansur Police Station Bansur District Kotputali Behror. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jai Raj Tantia For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP assisted by Mr. Anirudh Singh HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order 09/01/2026
1. Apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No.282/2025 registered at Police Station Bansur, District Kotputli-Behror for the offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 331(6), 189(2) and 110 of BNS, the accused-petitioner has preferred the anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that prima-facie offence under Section 110 of BNS is not made out. Custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required. The other co-accused has already been enlarged on regular bail. The petitioner being lady is ready to cooperate with the investigation. There are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner, therefore, the anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application.
[2026:RJ-JP:785] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-16766/2025]
4. Heard and perused the material available on record.
5. Considering the fact that the injury sustained to injured Santi Devi, Guddi, Bhup Singh, Kumari Dholi and Kumari Sonam were found to be simple blunt in nature except the injury sustained to injured Santi Devi caused at her middle finger which was found to be grievous in nature. The other co-accused have already been enlarged on regular bail, custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required, therefore, considering the above facts, I deem it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the petitioner Priyanka W/o Krishan, in connection with FIR No.282/2025 registered at Police Station Bansur, District Kotputli- Behror, she shall be released on bail, provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make herself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/296