1 2026:HHC:36527 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Cr. M.P. (M) No. 2821 of 2025 Decided on : 24.8.2026 Chunni Devi … Applicant Versus State of H.P. & anr. …Respondents _____________________________ ______________ Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge Whether approved for reporting? ___________________________________________________ For the Applicant : Kanwar Virender Singh, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. Mohinder Zharaick, Addl. A.G. with Ms. Ranjna Patial, Dy. A.G., for respondent No. 1. Mr. Aakash Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Virender Singh, Judge (oral) Applicant Chunni Devi has filed the present application under Section 483(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (hereinafter referred to as ‘the BNSS’), for cancellation of bail, against respondent No. 2, vide judgment dated 30.8.2025, in case FIR No. 13/2025, dated 15.6.2025, registered with Police Station, Moorang, District Kinnaur, H.P., under Sections 103(1), 109, 126(2), 191(2), 191(3), 190, 2 2026:HHC:36527 115(2), 351(3), 117(2), 238 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (hereinafter referred to as ‘the BNS’). 2. Applicant has pleaded that in the FIR in question, respondent No. 2 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the accused) has been released on bail, by this Court, on 30.8.2025. 3. As per the stand taken by the applicant, accused has intimidated the complainant and her minor son, aged about 12 years and threatened her with dire consequences. 4. It is the further case of the applicant that after murder of Krishan Lal, only the applicant and her minor son are in the family and due to the incident in question, the applicant is under trauma. Thereafter, the applicant after being threatened and intimidated by the accused, forwarded the complaint to the Chief Minister Sewa Sankalp Site bearing registration No. 1198014. 5. The conduct of the accused is stated to be constituting a serious interference with the due course 3 2026:HHC:36527 of justice and amounts to tampering with the prosecution witnesses. 6. On the basis of above facts, a prayer has been made to cancel the bail granted to the accused. 7. When, put to notice, the Police filed the reply/circumstances, reiterating the manner, in which, the FIR, in the present case, has been registered and investigation has been conducted. So far as the allegations, which have been levelled against the accused are concerned, it has been asserted that after receiving the complaint at Chief Minister Sewa Sankalp, the matter was inquired. 8. As per the report of the Police, applicant has made a statement before the Police to the effect that after the alleged incident, on 16.9.2025, no such incident had been repeated by the accused. It has been mentioned in the status report that the applicant, being satisfied with the police action, has given her consent to close the matter. 4 2026:HHC:36527 9. Alongwith the status report, Police has recorded the statement of the applicant, in the presence of Pradhan of Gram Panchayat, Rarang, in which, she has recorded her statement, to the effect that no action is required to be taken, in this case. 10. When, the applicant has made statement before the Police, qua her satisfaction with the action of the Police, then, no case is made out for cancellation of bail granted to the accused, by this Court, vide order dated 30.8.2025. 11. With these observations, the present application is dismissed. (Virender Singh) Judge 24.8.2026 Kalpana