Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20824 (RAJ)

ANIL KUMAR @ MITU SON OF SHRI PADAMARAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLAS/3313/2025 · 2026-01-13

Ganesh Ram Meena

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:1423] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 3313/2025 Anil Kumar @ Mitu Son Of Shri Padamaram, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of Narhad, Police Station Pilani, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In District Jail, Jhunjhunu) ----Appellant Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Subhash Chand Son Of Shri Hanuman Singh, Resident Of Ward No. 17, Sultana, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Dr. Arpan Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 13/01/2026 1. This criminal appeal has been filed by the accused-appellant u/S 14-A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 assailing the order dated 08.12.2025, passed by the Special Judge, SC/ST Cases, Jhunjhunu in bail application No. 340/2025, filed by the accused-appellant u/S 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 268/2025, registered at Police Station Chirawa, District Jhunjhunu for offences u/S 189(2), 126(2) & 115(2) of BNS, whereby the bail application filed by the accused-appellant was dismissed. 2. Learned counsel for the accused appellant submits that the accused appellant has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the FIR has been lodged against unknown [2026:RJ-JP:1423] (2 of 3) [CRLAS-3313/2025] persons whose faces were covered at the time of incident. Counsel also submits that none of the injuries sustained by the injured- Vijay Kumar has been opined to be dangerous to life. He further submits that the accused appellant is in custody since 28.11.2025 and he is no more required for any kind of interrogation and recovery. 3. Per-contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the appeal. 4. On consideration of the submissions made at bar and on perusal of the case diary, it is revealed that the injured Vijay Kumar has sustained 11 injuries, out of which 4 injuries have been opined to be grievous in nature but none of the same were on any vital part of the body of the injured. 5. Taking into consideration the contents of the FIR and so also the fact the none of the injuries which has been opined to be grievous in nature, were on vital part of the body of the injured and the accused petitioner is in custody since 28.11.2025, this Court feels that it is a fit case where the accused appellant deserves to be enlarged on bail. 6. Accordingly, this criminal appeal filed under Section 14-A(2) of SC/ST Act is allowed and order dated 08.12.2025, passed by the Special Judge, SC/ST Cases, Jhunjhunu in bail application No. 340/2025 is set aside. It is directed that appellant shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.268/2025, registered at Police Station Chirawa, District Jhunjhunu, provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every [2026:RJ-JP:1423] (3 of 3) [CRLAS-3313/2025] date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava /263