Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20823 (HP)

PAWAN KUMAR v. RAKESH KANWAR AND ANOTHER

COPC/315/2026 · 2026-08-27

Sushil Kukreja

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:HHC:36560 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.315 of 2026 Date of Decision: 27.08.2026 ___________________________________________________ Pawan Kumar ....Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & another …Respondents ___________________________________________________ Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 ________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Balwant Singh Thakur,Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ________________________________________________ Sushil Kukreja, Judge (Oral) Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record communication dated 25.08.2026, wherein it has been stated the DDO concerned has prepared the arrears bill of Rs.8,05,807/-, which is under the active consideration of the treasury concerned and as soon as the arrears bill is passed by the treasury, further action for releasing the arrears in favour of the petitioner will be taken accordingly. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:36560 2. Therefore, in this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and, accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. Notice discharged. 3. However, the petitioner is at liberty to approach this Court again, if the occasion arises to do so. The petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. ( Sushil Kukreja ) August 27, 2026 Judge (V. Himalvi)