[2026:RJ-JP:888] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16625/2025 Abhishek Kumar @ Sootar S/o Udai Singh, R/o Bailara, Police Station Nadbai, District Bharatpur (Raj.) ( At Present Confined In Central Jail Sewar, Bharatpur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16797/2025 Satveer Singh @ Patel @ Veer Faujdar S/o Leelapat, R/o Moti Nagla, Police Station Kumher, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (Currently In Central Jail, Bharatpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Sogarwal with Mr. Ashok Samoda Mr. Harendra Singh Sinsinwar with Mr. Shivam Sharma For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Rajesh Gadwal for Mr. Sanjay Buri HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 09/01/2026 1. The petitioners have preferred these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.354/2025 registered at Police Station-Nadbai, District-Bharatpur for the offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 333 and 109(1) of BNS. [2026:RJ-JP:888] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-16625/2025] 2. Since both the bail applications have arisen from common FIR, hence, they are being decided by this single order. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in these cases. He further submitted that though there is an allegation of use of a firearm but none of the injuries are dangerous to life and there is no medical opinion to that effect. It is submitted that the allegation of causing firearm injury to Sarman pertains to non-vital part of the body, and the injury to Pista was on the left leg, which is also not a vital part. It is submitted that though one case is pending against the petitioner-Abhishek Kumar @ Sootar and two cases are pending against the petitioner-Satveer Singh @ Patel @ Veer Faujdar but in all cases they have been bailed out. The other co- accused-Harveer, Nishul Kumar and Bharatlal @ Sanjup have been enlarged on bail by this Court on 10.12.2025 and co-accused- Jaiprakash @ Bittu, Sanni, Vishal @ Nepali, Bhola @ Leelo, Sourabh and Boby have also been enlarged on bail by this Court on 12.11.2025. It is submitted that the petitioner-Abhishek Kumar @ Sootar is behind the bars since 24.11.2025 and petitioner- Satveer Singh @ Patel @ Veer Faujdar is behind the bars since 09.09.2025, therefore, on the ground of parity, the petitioners may also be granted bail. No custodial interrogation is required. The trial of the cases may take considerable time, therefore, no [2026:RJ-JP:888] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-16625/2025] fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, hence, the bail applications of the petitioners may be allowed. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail applications. 6. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 7. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners-Abhishek Kumar @ Sootar S/o Udai Singh and Satveer Singh @ Patel @ Veer Faujdar S/o Leelapat shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/3 & 5