Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20821 (KAR)

RANGASHYAMAIAH v. SANNAPPA

RSA/2373/2017 · 2026-06-10

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27777 RSA No. 2373 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 2373 OF 2017 (INJ) BETWEEN: RANGASHYAMAIAH S/O RANGAIAH,AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O MUDIMADU VILLAGE,KALLAMBELLA HOBLI, SIRA TALUK - 572132. …APPELLANT (BY SRI HANUMANTHARAYAPPA ,ADVOCATE) AND: SANNAPPA, S/O DODDALINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O MUDIMADU VILLAGE,KALLAMBELLA HOBLI, SIRA TALUK - 572137. …RESPONDENT THIS RSA IS FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DTD 01.02.2017 PASSED IN R.A.NO. 41/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., SIRA, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DTD 28.08.2015 PASSED IN OS.NO.465/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., SIRA. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA Digitally signed by PRAMILA G V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27777 RSA No. 2373 of 2017 ORAL JUDGMENT Plaintiff is the appellant in the second appeal challenging the dismissal of the suit. In the meantime, sole respondent said to have died. If there is a cause that would survive for consideration in view of the fact that the legal representatives of the sole respondent or anybody claiming under him were to interfere with the possession of the suit property, plaintiff may file a fresh suit. With that liberty, appeal stand dismissed. In view of the dismissal, pending applications are consigned to records. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE brn List No.: 1 Sl No.: 63