Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20819 (AP)

BHAVARAJU SARAT CHAND v. BAVISETTY JAGADFEESWARA RAO AND ANOTHER

CRP/5292/2017 · 2026-03-01

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010244602017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] MONDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 5292/2017 Between: 1. BHAVARAJU SARAT CHAND, S/O VENKATA RAMANA RAO, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, HINDU, OCC: ELECTRONIC BUSINESS, R/O D.NO.50-53-2/2, SAI GANAPATHI NIVAS, SEETHAMMADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. BAVISETTY JAGADFEESWARA RAO AND ANOTHER, S/O B. APPA RAO, AGED 39 YEARS, HINDU, R/O D.NO.49-36-21/3, N.G.G.O.S COLONY, AKKAYYAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530 016. 2. CHANDAKA ARJUNA RAO, S/O LATE RAMU NAIDU, AGED 40 YEARS, HINDU, R/O SRINIVASANAGAR, AKKAYYAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM ANDHRA PRADESH-530 016 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toaggrieved by the order dt. 22/08/2017 in Ia.no. 486 of 2017 in Os.no. 215 of 2017 on the file of the Hon'ble VI Additional District Judge, Visakhapatnam Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S RAM BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 2 1. VLADIMEER KHATOON The court made the following ORDER:- The instant civil revision petition has been filed challenging the order dated 22.08.2017 passed in I.A.No.486 of 2017 in O.S.No.215 of 2017 on the file of VI Addl. District Judge, Visakhapatnam., whereunder, Order XXXVIII Rule 5 C.P.C., conditional attachment petition was allowed. 2. When the matter is called, there is no representation on either side. 3. As per the E-courts status furnished by the Registry, the main suit itself was decreed with costs on 12.03.2025. Hence, this Court is of the opinion that no further orders are required to be passed in the present revision petition. 4. Therefore, the civil revision petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 02.03.2026 GVK 3 59 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5292 of 2017 Date: 02.03.2026 GVK 4