- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27830 WP No. 16947 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 16947 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: H R SARALAKUMARI D/O K.R.RANGANNA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O NO 14/127, 2ND FLOOR, 3RD MAIN, 3RD CROSS, GANDHI NAGARA, YALAHANKA, BENGALURU-560064. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HALLI SHANTAPPA BASAPPA., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KOLAR DISTRICT, KOLAR-563131. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER KOLAR SUB-DIVISION, KOLAR-563131. 3. TAHASILDAR KOLAR TALUK, KOLAR-DISTRICT-563131. 4. NANJAMMA W/O SEENAPPA, Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27830 WP No. 16947 of 2026 AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O CHIKKANAHALLI VILLAGE, SUGATURU HOBLI, KOLAR-TALUK, KOLAR-DISTRICT-563131. 5. PAPAMMA @PADMAMMA, W/O CHANDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O DODDANAHALLI VILLAGE, HUTTUR HOBLI, KOLAR-TALUK, KOLAR-DISTRICT-563131. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.B.J.ESWARAPPA., AGA FOR R1 TO R3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO-2 IN RA/856/2023 DATED 30/07/2025 PRODUCED ANNEXEURE-G TO THE WRIT PETITION AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondent Nos.1 to 3. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27830 WP No. 16947 of 2026 2. In this writ petition, petitioner assailing the order dated 30.07.2025 in R.A.No.856/2023 (Annexure-G) passed by R2 and order dated 23.03.2026 in RAP/379/2025 (Annexure-J) passed by respondent No.1. 3. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and the perusal of the findings recorded by the respondent-authorities indicates that the katha in respect of the private respondents herein has been made pursuant to the judgment and decree dated 16.08.2022 in F.D.P No.32/2017. 4. In that view of the matter, I do not find any perversity in the impugned orders passed by the respondent authorities at Annexures-G and J respectively. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE KLY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 36