MD. SAMIR ANSARI ALAIS RINKU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./6747/2026 · 2026-07-20
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20815 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20815 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:21402] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6747 of 2026
Md. Samir Ansari @ Rinku, aged about 25 years, Son of Shaukat Ansari, Resident of Jhagri, P.O. Barwadih & P.S. -Giridih (M), District-Giridih, Jharkhand.
… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… Opp. Party
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. Prabhash Ch. Sinha, Adv. For the State : Mr. Azeemuddin ,Addl. PP
02 / 20.07.2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Giridih (M)P.S. Case No. 373 of 2025 instituted under Section 109 and 61(2) of BNS, 2023 and Section 27 of Arms Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in criminal conspiracy with the co-accused, attempted to murder Khurshid Ansari by firing upon him. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and the petitioner is not named in the FIR and the allegation of firing from the fire-arms is upon the co- accused Jakir Ansari. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 10 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 12.03.2026 , as mentioned in para 9 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the
case. It is next submitted that the co-accused with similar allegations has already been admitted on bail by this court vide order dated 22.04.2026 passed in B.A. no. 3352 of 2026 hence, the petitioner may be admitted to bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M, Giridih in connection with Giridih (M)P.S. Case No. 373 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case and will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case.
(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Dated 20.07.2026
Smita/-