Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20811 (AP)

Dr. Pallamreddy Apoorva v. Mr. Pravin Kumar, I.A.S

CC/2628/2024 · 2026-01-07

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010240582024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2628/2024 Between: 1. DR. PALLAMREDDY APOORVA,, D/O. P. SRINIVASULU REDDY, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O. SRI DURGA HOSPITAL, BRINDAVANAM NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 2. DR. P.S.REDDY @ SRINIVASULU REDDY,, S/O. P.V. RAMASUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCC. MEDICAL R/O. SRI DURGA HOSPITAL, BRINDAVANAM, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. MR PRAVIN KUMAR I A S, DIRECTOR MINES AND GEOLOGY,DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY ,SRI ANJANEYA TOWERS,D.NO.7-104,B-BLOCK,5TH AND 6TH FLOORS,IBRAHIMPATNAM,VIJAYAWADA,A.P-521456 CUASE TILE AMENDED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 23/09/24 VIDE IA NO-2 OF 2024 IN CC NO-2628 OF 2024 2. MR M KIRAN KUMAR, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GUDUR, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 3. MR K SREENIVASULU, TAHSILDAR, CHILLAKUR MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 4. DR S VENKATESWAR, DISTRICT COLLECTOR TIRUPATI DISTRICT AT TIRUPATI R4 IS IMPLEADED AS PER COURT 2 ORDER DATED 26 11 2024 VIDE I A NO 1 OF 2024 IN CC NO 2628 OF 2024 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents herein under the provisions of Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India, for willful and deliberate violation of the orders of this Honourable Court dated 12.01.2024 made in W.P.No.32504 of 2023 IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead the above-mentioned Proposed Respondent as party Respondent/Respondent No. 4 in CC No. 2628/2024 and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to amend the cause title in respect of 1st respondent in C.C No. 2628 of 2024 to be read as “1. Mr. Pravin Kumar, IAS, Director Mines and Geology, Department of Mines and Geology, Sri Anjaneya Towers, D.No. 7-104, B- Block, 5th and 6th Floors, Ibrahimpatnam, Vijayawada, A.P- 521456. (The Then District Collector, Tirupati District.)” and pas IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to receive copies of (1) proceedings of CCLA in Ref. no. Assn.l (1)/3933/2018 dated 27.09.2018 and (2) the Letters addressed by the RDO, Gudur to the District Collector, SPSR Nellore District dated 09.11.2018 and 06.10.2021, (3) the acknowledgements of online application of the petitioner dated 27.12.2023 for mutation and issuance of pattadar passbooks and title deeds, (4) application of the petitioner dated 19-02-2024 and (5) interim 3 order dated 19.12.2023 in WP No. 32504 of 2023 as additional material papers in support of the petitioner in the above contempt case and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. C V R RUDRA PRASAD Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 2. K M KRISHNA REDDY 3. SUSHMA YAGANTI The Court made the following ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for the willful disobedience of the orders dated 12.01.2024 passed in W.P.No.32504 of 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the respondents have passed adhoc orders, as such, the orders of this Court disobedience of which is complained of in this contempt case has been complied with and there remains nothing for adjudication, accordingly, prayed to close the contempt. 3. Recording the said submission, as the authorities have passed orders, the Contempt Case is closed. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 08th January, 2026 RKS