Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20810 (DEL)

VIPIN PURAN SINGH v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI, & ORS.

W.P.(C)/14299/2026 · 2026-09-30

Saurabh Banerjee

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010466062026 + W.P.(C) 14299/2026, CM APPL. 67075/2026 VIPIN PURAN SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ikrant Sharma, Ms. Pooja Kumari Gupta and Mr. Saksham Mittal, Advs. (M-9810069880) versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI, & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Arti Bansal ASC with Ms. Shruti Goel, Ms. Yashika Rawat, Advocate with Mr. Rakesh Brijwal AE. MCD and K.K. Sharma AE for R1 (M-9999442349) Mr. Amit Kumar Dogra SPC with Mr. Kamaldeep GP for R5 & R6 (M-9990950303) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE O R D E R % 30.09.2026 1. Apropos the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondent no.1/ MCD on 28.09.2026, the Status Report has been handed over by the learned counsel for the MCD, which is taken on record, and wherein it has been categorically mentioned as under: “… … 6. That in respect of the property depicted in the photographs, i.e. Property No. 2167, Chah Indara, Chandni Chowk, Delhi, proceedings under the Delhi Municipal This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/10/2026 at 11:17:24 Corporation Act, 1957 have already been initiated by the Building Department as unauthorized construction was found in the shape of entire ground floor, first floor, second floor and third floor and the same was booked vide U/c file no.125/UC/74/B-II/ODZ/2026 dated 28.09.2026. That in continuation the same show cause notice under section 344(1) and 343 of the DMC Act 1957, was issued vide printed no.24562 dated 28.09.2026 to the owner/builder of the subject property. Copy of the show cause notice dated 28.09.2026 is annexed herewith as Annexure A. …. …” 2. Considering the aforesaid, particularly, since the MCD is taking all actions in accordance with law, there is nothing remaining in the present petition. 3. In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty to seek appropriate remedies in accordance with law. 4. Accordingly, the present petition, alongwith the pending application, is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. SAURABH BANERJEE, J SEPTEMBER 30, 2026/So This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/10/2026 at 11:17:24