Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:HHC:36010-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.6746 of 2022 Decided on: 25.08.2026 Joginder Pal … Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________
_
For the petitioner: Mr. Onkar Jairath, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Piyush Mehta, Advocate. For the respondents: Ms. Shubh Mahajan, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Naresh Mahajan, Advocate. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that recently the State has issued instructions vide Office Memorandum dated 01.07.2026, in terms whereof, even those cases of compassionate appointment which stand rejected on the basis of high income are being reviewed. He submits that these proceedings be closed with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Authorities afresh in light of said instructions.
2. As prayed for, these proceedings are closed with the observation that in case the petitioner approaches the Authority by way of representation in terms of the above mentioned instructions for reconsideration of his case, then the Authorities shall reconsider the case of the petitioner in terms of the said instructions. It goes without saying that earlier rejection of the case of the petitioner shall 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2 2026:HHC:36010-DB not weigh with the Authorities while deciding the representation.
3. The petition stands disposed of, so also pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge August 25, 2026 (Rishi)