Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20804 (AP)

DURGAM SUBRAMANYAM v. SRI SHASIBHUSHAN KUMAR IAS

CC/2688/2024 · 2026-02-19

R Raghunandan Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010236392024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3206] FRIDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2688/2024 Between: 1. DURGAM SUBRAMANYAM, S/O DURGAM ANKAIAH, AGED 43 YEARS, OCC. AGRICITURE, R/O 1/5, KOTHAPALLI VILLAGE, SRINIVASA PURAM POST, KODURU MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI SHASIBHUSHAN KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, IRRIGATION AND WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI V SAI RAM PRASAD, CHIEF ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION, VIJAYAWADA NTR DISTRICT. 3. SRI D VENKATARAMAIAH, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WRD,IRRIGATION DIVISION, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 4. P CHANGAL RAYUDU, THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER IRRIGATION SUB-DIVISION,KODURU, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. (ERLIERYSR KADAPA DISTRICT) 5. SRI M ABHISHIKTH KISHORE I A S, THE COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT,RAYACHOTI. 6. SRI S S RAWAT I A S, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, PRINCIPAL FINANCE SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT 2 RRR,J C.C.No.2688 of 2024 BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents under the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for violation of the orders and for not implementing the orders of this Honble Court passed in WP.No.2061 of 2023 dated 25.04.2023 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to recall the Bailable Warrant issued against the Respondent No.3 in C.C.No.2688 of 2024 dated:31.01.2026 and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to recall the Bailable Warrant issued against the Respondent No.4 in C.C.No.2688 of 2024 dated. 31.01.2026 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PRATHIWADA VARUN KUMAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. SOMA RAJU YELISETTI 2. 3 RRR,J C.C.No.2688 of 2024 The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the payments due to the petitioner have been cleared. 2. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J Date:20.02.2026 KPV 4 RRR,J C.C.No.2688 of 2024 74 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.2688 of 2024 20.02.2026 KPV