Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 208 (JHR)

TARA MINZ v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY

W.P.(Cr.)/11/2024 · 2026-03-23

Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:8081 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (Cr.) No. 11 of 2024 ------ 1. Tara Minz, wife of Niranjan Minz 2. Alferd Minz, son of Late Subhash Minz Both residents of Village Khadia Pada, P.O. Khadiya Pada, P.S & District Gumla .... .... …. Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through its Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, office situated at Project Building, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi 2. Principal Secretary, Department of Home and Disaster Management Office, situated at Project Building, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi 3. Director General of Police, Jharkhand, office situated at Police House, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi 4. The Superintendent of Police, Gumla, P.O. & P.S. Gumla, District Gumla 5. Officer-in-Charge, Gumla Police Station, P.O. & P.S. Gumla, District Gumla .... .... .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY For the Petitioners : Mr. Ajeet Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Deepankar, A.C. to G.A. III ------ Order No.07 / Dated : 23.03.2026 Heard Mr. Ajeet Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Deepankar, learned A.C. to G.A. III. 2. In this writ application, the petitioner has prayed for direction upon the respondents to institute a First Information Report on the basis of a written report date 03.01.2024. 3. The counter affidavit which has been filed by the State, reveals that the matter was enquired into and it was found that there was a civil dispute between the petitioners and their adversary and in fact, a suit is also pending being Original Suit No.2 of 2024 before the Court of Civil Judge (Sr. Division-I), Gumla. It also appears that a writ application was also preferred by the petitioners being W.P.(C) No.5172 of 2023 which was disposed of on 22.03.2024 with certain directions giving liberty to the petitioners to approach the SAR Court for restoration of the land under Section 71A of the Chotanagpur Tenancy Act. 4. In view of the fact that the liberty which has been given to the petitioners, has been availed of by approaching the Civil Court, I am not inclined to entertain this writ application which is accordingly, disposed of. (Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.) Anit Uploaded 25.03.2026