[2026:RJ-JP:309] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19959/2025 1. Raghuveer Nagar S/o Late Shri Govind Ram Nagar, Aged About 66 Years, R/o N-148, Ashok Vihar B, Jagatpura Jaipur. 2. Yogesh Meena S/o Shri Brijmohan Meena, Aged About 46 Years, R/o House No. N-117, Ashok Vihar B, Jagatpura Jaipur. 3. Hemlata Jain W/o Shri Munnalal Jain, Aged About 60 Years, R/o House No. N-152, Ashok Vihar B, Jagatpura Jaipur. 4. Lakshmikant Meena S/o Shri Ramkesh Meena, Aged About 33 Years, R/o House No. N-150, Ashok Vihar B, Jagatpura Jaipur. 5. Ramkishan Meena S/o Shri Bhanwar Lal, Aged About 51 Years, R/o House No. N-151, Ashok Vihar B, Jagatpura Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur Through Secretary, Indra Circle, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashish Sharma Upadhyay with Mr. Harendra Tiwari & Mr. Saurabh Yadav For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 07/01/2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "It is, therefore, most humbly prayed that Your Lordships may kindly allow the writ petition by passing an appropriate writ, order or direction:- a) To direct the respondent JDA not to create third party rights and also not to create lease deed in pursuance of [2026:RJ-JP:309] (2 of 2) [CW-19959/2025] e-auction (Annexure-10) in favour of any person with regard to the 24-meter sector road in question which may finish the scope of the alignment of the said road till the pendency of the appeal already filed with the Tribunal, JDA Jaipur and may quash and set aside the impugned order dated 10.12.2025 (Annexure-13). Or b) To direct the Learned JDA Tribunal to decide the stay application expeditiously and till the decision of the 2nd stay application, the JDA may restrain to confirm the sale auctions (Annexure-10) c) Any other order which this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the petitioners." 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, upon instructions from his client, submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if the Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur Development Authority (JDA) is directed to decide the second stay application expeditiously in a time bound manner. 3. Heard. 4. Considering the fact that since the service in the pending appeal, the reply, and the pleadings are complete, therefore, the Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur Development Authority (JDA) is directed to decide the Second Stay Application No.1823/2025 in Appeal No.886/2025 of the petitioner expeditiously, preferably within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of filing of the certified copy of this order. 5. With the aforesaid direction, the present writ petition stands disposed of. 6. Other pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of, accordingly. (MANEESH SHARMA),J DEEPA-20