YASIN ANSARI @ YASEEN ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./6677/2026 · 2026-07-18
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20795 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20795 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:21312 ] THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.6677 of 2026
------ Yasin Ansari @ Yaseen Ansari age 26 years, Son of Md. Jafar Ansari, Resident of Village-Jhordiha, P.O. & P.S. Rehla, District- Palamu, Jharkhand.
.... .... …. Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party.
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sabyasanchi, Advocate.
For the State
: Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 18-07-2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Nawa Bazar P.S. Case No. 66 of 2025, registered for the offence punishable under Section 105 of the B.N.S. 2023.
Learned counsel for the informant files Vakalatnama.
Keep the same in the record.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed culpable homicide not amounting to murder by committing death of the two months grandson of the informant because of the improper treatment. It jointly submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the informant that the matter has been settled between the parties. In this respect the learned counsel for the petitioner draws the attention of this Court to compromise petition filed by the parties before the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Palamau at Daltonganj. It is further submitted that the case was instituted because of some misunderstanding. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 04.05.2026 as mentioned in para-17 and has no criminal antecedents as mentioned in para-18 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Palamu at Daltonganj in connection with Nawa Bazar P.S. Case No. 66 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 18/07/2026 Amar/