SANJANA VERMA D/O SHRI RAMNARAYAN VERMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLW/1669/2025 · 2026-01-29
Anil Kumar Upman
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20794 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20794 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:4253] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1669/2025
1. Sanjana Verma D/o Shri Ramnarayan Verma, aged about 19 Years, R/o Shivdaspura, Jaipur, presently R/o Kha- teeko Ka Mohalla, Gothda, District Bundi (Raj.).
2. Manish Chandel S/o Heeralal Chandel, aged about 25 years, R/o Khateeko Ka Mohalla, Gothda, District Bundi (Raj.). ----Petitioners Versus
1. State of Rajasthan through Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, and Justice, Secretariat Rajasthan, Ajmer.
2. Superintendent of Police, Bundi.
3. Station House Officer, Police Station Dablana, District Bundi.
4. Ramnarayan Verma S/o Ramchandra Raigar, R/o Shiv- daspura, Jaipur.
5. Rajni Devi W/o Ramnarayan Verma, R/o Shivdaspura, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 29/01/2026
1. Defects pointed out by the Registry are overruled.
2. Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel.
3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos.4 and 5 as
[2026:RJ-JP:4253] (2 of 2) [CRLW-1669/2025] they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are major and they are mature enough to take decision of their life. It is submitted that the petitioners are living in a live- in-relationship and in this regard, an agreement dated 09.09.2025 has also been executed between them, which has been annexed with this petition. Learned counsel further submits that petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection.
5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are
directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.3- Station House Officer, Police Station Dablana, District Bundi (Raj.) and respondent No.3 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners.
6. The criminal writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand
disposed of.
8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /242