Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:331] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16718/2025 Samsher S/o Sitab, Aged About 69 Years, R/o Ladlaka, Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shivam, for Mr. Harendra Singh Sinsinwar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order 07/01/2026
1. This bail application has been filed by the accused petitioner u/S 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 110/2025, registered with the Police Station, Jurhera, District Deeg for offence punishable u/S 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 333, 352 of B.N.S. 2023.
2. It is submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that accused-petitioner is an old age person of 69 years. He further submits that as per contents of First Information Report the allegations made against the accused-petitioner is that he along with four certain accused persons have given beating to Hakam.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that there is one grievous injury sustained by the injured Abrar which has
[2026:RJ-JP:331] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-16718/2025] not been attributed to the present petitioner. He also submits that accused-petitioner is in custody since 30.11.2025.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application and submits that one of the Abrar has sustained grievous injury on Chest.
5. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the case diary.
6. As per investigation report, the allegation against the accused-petitioner is of giving beating to the Hakam. The MLR and X-ray report speaks that Abrar has sustained one grievous injury on his chest but the injury has not been attributed to the present petitioner.
7. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioner and so also that fact that the accused-petitioner is an old age person of 69 years and the fact that he is in custody since 30.11.2025, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail.
7. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any
[2026:RJ-JP:331] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-16718/2025] Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /195