Shivani Kinnar @ Shivani Kumari v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./39952/2026 · 2026-06-30
Satyavrat Verma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20788 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20788 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39952 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-272 Year-2024 Thana- MANER District- Patna ======================================================
1. Shivani Kinnar @ Shivani Kumari D/O Dukhan Chaudhary Guru of Puja Rani Kinnar, R/O Village- Maner Bazar, P.S.- Maner, Distt- Patna. 2. Monika @ Monika Kinnar @ Ranjit S/O Vijay Singh Thakur Guru of Puja Rani Kinnar, R/O Village- Maner Bazar, P.S.- Maner, Distt.- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ashok Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Anil Kumar Singh No. 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 30-06-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the instant anticipatory bail application with respect to petitioner no.1, Shivani Kinnar @ Shivani Kumari, who was arrested during pendency of the anticipatory bail application. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with respect to petitioner no.1, Shivani Kinnar @ Shivani Kumari. 5. The petitioner no.2 seeks bail in anticipation of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39952 of 2026(2) dt.30-06-2026 2/3 his/her arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 447, 341, 323, 307, 427, 448, 380, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that Shivani Kinnar hired two dancers from her on 17.04.2024 at the rate of Rs.2500/- per day, the dancers performed for 12 days, but the payment was not made. Further, on 28.04.2024, the husband of the informant Golu along with his disciples Gea and Misty went to the house of Shivani seeking payment, on which Shivani refused, hence the disciples of Golu objected Shivani, on account of which Golu was assaulted causing injury on head and he was taken to hospital. Further, at 2.00 P.M. named accused persons including the petitioner came along with 10-20 unknown accused persons to her house and assaulted her and vandalized the household articles, broke the CCTV and looted Rs.7 Lakhs and snatched her chain and mobile. 7. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant.
It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegations as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that no
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39952 of 2026(2) dt.30-06-2026 3/3 specific allegation of assault is alleged against the petitioner. It is next submitted that from perusal of the order impugned, it would manifest that all injured suffered simple injury. 8. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application. 9. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner no.2, above-named, in the event of his/her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his/her furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Maner P. S. Case No.272 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
10. The application stands allowed. vikash/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T