Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28049 WP No. 7640 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO. 7640 OF 2022 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
SRI. B.S. NATARAJ, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, S/O SHIVANNA, R/AT NO.R 630, 9TH D MAIN, HAMPINAGARA (RPC LAYOUT) VIJAYANAGAR 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 040. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. THANISH C. REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. ABHINAV RAMANAND A., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
SMT. USHA JAYARAJ, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, W/O SRI. P. JAYARAJ, R/AT NO.629, 9TH D MAIN, HAMPINAGAR, (RPC LAYOUT) VIJAYANAGAR 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 040.
2.
SRI. H.P. MAHESH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, S/O SRI. H.N. PUTTAIAH, R/AT NO.274, 3RD B CROSS, 3RD STAGE, 2ND BLOCK, Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28049 WP No. 7640 of 2022 BASAVESHWARANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 079.
3.
SMT. GEETHA N., AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, D/O SRI. S. NANJUNDASWAMY, R/AT NO.1026, 5TH MAIN, 3RD BLOCK, 3RD STAGE, BASAVESHWARANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 079. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SANJAY B.K., ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI. JAYARAJ GOWDA M.N., ADVOCATE FOR C/R2 AND R3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 21.03.2022 PASSED BY THE XXIV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSION JUDGE, BENGAURU, (CCH-6) IN O.S.NO.693/2022 (SUIT) AT ANNEXURE-F TO THE WRIT PETITION AND ALLOW THE INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATIONS DATED 21.03.2022 FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN O.S.NO.693/2022 AT ANNEXURE-D AND E TO THE WRIT PETITION BY ALLOWING THE PRESENT PETITION AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28049 WP No. 7640 of 2022 ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner filed a memo indicating that the writ petition has rendered infructuous. The memo reads as under:
"The Petitioner respectfully submits that subsequent to the filing of the above Writ Petition, the Interlocutory Application No.1 which forms the subject matter of challenge in the present proceedings has already been allowed by the learned Trial Court by order dated 19.04.2024 and, therefore, the grievance sought to be agitated herein no longer survives for
consideration. Consequently, the present Writ Petition has become infructuous. Hence, this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to take this Memo on record and dispose of the above Writ Petition as having become infructuous, in the interest of justice and equity."
2. In view of the aforesaid memo, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE MCR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 37