CRWP No.6009
IN TH 156 Aajad Sing State of Ha CORAM: Present: SUMEET G 1. necessary di to them ar petitioners c copies of th of birth of t birth of the p 2. not a must because pro highest ped co-ordinate of Punjab 6009 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA CHANDIGAR ***** Singh and another v. Haryana and others AM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SU Mr. Sudesh Kumar, Advocate f --- EET GOEL, J. (Oral) The petitioners have approach sary directions for protecting their life em are at stake because they are i ners claim themselves to be major in t s of the Aadhar Cards (Annexure P-1 th of the petitioner No.1-Aajad Singh of the petitioner No.2-Anita is 8.3.1999 Learned counsel for the petitio must for providing security to a cou se protection qua life and liberty is st pedestal. He has also placed relian ate Bench of this Court in ‘Sarabje jab and others’ in CRWP-102- -1-
UNJAB AND HARYANA AT IGARH CRWP No.6009 of 2026 Date of decision: 21.5.2026 Date of uploading : 21.5.2026 …......Petitioners …......Respondents CE SUMEET GOEL ocate for the petitioners proached this Court for issuance of eir life and liberties which according are in a live-in-relationship. The jor in terms of age. According to the 1 and P-2 respectively), the date Singh is 15.7.2000 and the date of .3.1999. petitioners submits that a marriage is a couple in a ‘live-in-relationship’ rty is sacrosanct and stands at the reliance upon orders passed by the rabjeet Kaur and another v. State -2022 decided on 07.01.2022;
2026 2026 2026 ce of rding The o the date te of ge is ship’ t the y the tate 022; ASHWANI KUMAR 2026.05.21 17:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP No.6009
‘Goutam K 8088-2021 Chandigarh CRWP-1106 3. respondents 4. DAG, Harya 5. the case as petitioners; Palwal, to representatio on 19.5.202 two weeks f 6. in any othe authority fro 7. 21.5.2026 Ashwanii 6009 of 2026 m Kumar and another v. State of P 021 decided on 26.08.2021; Bharti igarh & others and ‘Annu Rani & 11060-2023 decided on 15.11.2023. Notice of motion to respond ndents). On the asking of the Court, , Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of t At this stage, without expressin se as well as on the age and nature o ners; I deem it appropriate to direct to look into the matter and pass entation stated to have been filed by .5.2026 (Annexure P-3) & pass appro eeks from today. However, if the petitioners are y other case, then this order shall rity from taking lawful action against t The petition stands disposed of Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable: -2-
of Punjab and others’ in CRWP- arti and Another v. State of U.T., i & Anr. v. State of Haryana’ in .2023. espondent Nos.1 to 3 (i.e. official ourt, Ms. Mahima Yashpal, Senior alf of the official respondents. pressing any opinion on the merits of ature of the relationship between the direct respondent No.2–SP, District pass an appropriate order on the led by the petitioners before him/her appropriate orders thereupon within ers are found to have been involved shall not preclude the competent ainst the petitioners. sed of. (SUMEET GOEL) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No
- .T., in ficial enior its of n the strict the /her ithin lved etent ASHWANI KUMAR 2026.05.21 17:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document