APHC010236802019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 10534/2019 Between: 1. GADE BRAHMENDRA REDDY @ BRAHMA REDDY,, S/O. SAMBI REDDY, OCC- ADVOCATE, R/O. NARAYANAI HOME APARTMENTS, FLAT NO. 209, OPP- A.G. MARKET ROAD, NIDAMARRU ROAD, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT. I HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT. VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR DISTRICT AT GUNTUR. 3. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MANGALAGIRI RURAL POLICE STATION, MANGALAGIRI TOWN AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. LEELAVATHI GADE, W/O. VENKATESWARA REDDY, AAED 65 YEARS. NIDAMARRU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of Respondents 1 to 3 in not filing final report, though found that 2 the 4th respondent falsely reported as against the petitioner and others in FIR No. 283 of 2016 in Mangalagiri Rural Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 324, r/mi 34 LP.0 as illegal, irregular and amounts to non-discharge of legal obligation conferred on the respondents 1 to 3 under the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 1973 and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents 1 to 3 to close the FIR or file final report as false in the said Crime IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 1 to 3 particularly 3rd respondent to close the FIR or file Final Report in FIR No. 283 of 2016 pending on its file as false, pending disposal of main Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.10534 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: <….to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of Respondents 1 to 3 in not filing final report, though found that the 4th respondent falsely reported as against the petitioner and others in FIR No.283 of 2016 in Mangalagiri Rural Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 324, r/w 34 I.P.C. as illegal, irregular and amounts to non-discharge of legal obligation conferred on the respondents 1 to 3 under the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents 1 to 3 to close the FIR or file final report as false in the said Crime and pass…= 2. Heard learned counsel representing Smt.Nimmagadda Revathi, leaned counsel for the petitioner and Sri R.Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions would submit that police completed investigation in Crime No.283 of 2016 and laid charge sheet on 25.03.2017 vide C.C.No.600 of 2017 on the file of the learned Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Mangalagiri and the case is pending for Trial. He would further submit that in the light of said facts, the writ petition has become infructuous and no further orders are required in the writ petition. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in the light of above submissions made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, as charge sheet filed and no further orders are 4 required in the writ petition and the Writ Petition can be disposed of as infructuous, without going into merits of the case. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 28.01.2026 Pmk 5 37 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:10534 OF 2019 Date: 28.01.2026 Pmk