Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20782 (RAJ)

RESHAM SINGH SON OF DARSHAN SINGH v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMA/660/2025 · 2026-01-15

Ashutosh Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:1515] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 660/2025 In S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 752/2006 Resham Singh Son Of Darshan Singh, Resident Of Barbada Police Station Ramgarh District Alwar. At Present In Central Jail Alwar. ----Accused-Applicant Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through The PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 661/2025 In S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 752/2006 Kulwant Singh Son Of Dalip Singh, Resident Of Barbada Police Station Ramgarh District Alwar. ----Accused-Applicant Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through The PP ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Harendra Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, Dy.GA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 15/01/2026 1. The matter comes upon application Nos. 660/2025 & 661/2025 in S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 752/2006 titled as Resham Singh & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan, by which the revision petition filed by the accused-applicants against the judgment dated 07.07.2006 passed by learned Additional District & Sessions [2026:RJ-JP:1515] (2 of 3) [CRLMA-660/2025] Judge Laxmangarh, District Alwar, was partly allowed and following order was passed by this Court vide order dated 30.07.2025:- "9. Accordingly, the present petition is partly allowed. While maintaining the conviction of the petitioners for the offence punishable under Sections 3/25 of Arms Act, the sentence awarded to them is ordered to be reduced to the period already undergone by them. However, the petitioners shall be liable to pay the fine imposed by the learned trial Court and upheld by the learned Appellate Court. It is directed that the petitioners shall deposit the fine within three months from today. It is also directed that in default of payment of fine by the petitioners, each of them shall undergo simple imprisonment of two months. The petitioners are on bail. Their bail bonds stand discharged accordingly." 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicants submits that the accused-applicants could not contact the learned counsel in regard with the said order, therefore, the fine has not been deposited within the stipulated time. Learned counsel also submits that on account of not depositing the amount of fine, the accused- applicant namely; Resham Singh S/o Darshan Singh has been arrested and is behind the bars. Learned counsel further submits that now he is in contact with the accused-applicants, therefore, some time may be granted to deposit the amount of fine i.e. Rs.500/- each ordered by this Court vide order dated 30.07.2025. 3. Per contra, learned Deputy Government Advocate opposes the present miscellaneous applications. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. [2026:RJ-JP:1515] (3 of 3) [CRLMA-660/2025] 5. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, one month further time from the passing of this order is granted to the accused-applicants to deposit the amount of fine i.e. Rs. 500/- each as ordered by this Court vide order dated 30.07.2025. 6. In view of the fact that the accused-applicant Resham Singh S/o Darshan Singh has been arrested and presently detained in Central Jail, Alwar, therefore, learned trial Court is directed to issue order/direction to the concerned authorities to release accused-applicant Resham Singh in this case forthwith, if not wanted in any other case. 7. Accordingly, both the criminal miscellaneous applications stand disposed of. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J Mohita /117-118